Deliciously understated passages like the following make the new Roberts book an occasionally pleasurable read:
It is hard to be friends with an unrepentant cannibal. Even if he is not at the moment eyeing my musculature with a fond view to the tenderloins, still the fact that my tenderloins are the kind of thing on which he feeds threatens to spoil everything. I may not notice that the relationship is spoiled. For one thing, I may be so crass that I accept this mutual cannibalism with equanimity; perhaps I don’t have an inkling what spiritual friendship is. Dog-eat-dog is just the name of the game; what does it matter if after we’ve had some nice meals together, one of ends up in the other’s pot? Only I’d better watch out that if that happens, it’s me who makes a meal of him, and not the other way around. On the other hand, if I am not so crass, I may achieve equanimity by deceiving myself a little about the mutual cannibalism. I say to myself, “I would never eat him, for he is my friend; and I’m sure he wouldn’t eat me, either. It would never come to that. No, I’m sure it wouldn’t”. But the way to avoid all these doubts and troubles is to give up cannibalism.
–Robert C. Roberts, Spiritual Emotions: A Psychology of Christian Virtues (Eerdmans, 2007)




Posts

